Recently in Armed Robbery Category

January 20, 2012

Woman Allegedly Robbed at Gunpoint Following a Pizza Delivery

Jacksonville Criminal Defense LawyerOn Tuesday night a pizza delivery woman was allegedly robbed at gunpoint. According to reports, the woman completed a pizza delivery around 8 PM when, on her way to her vehicle, an armed man approached from behind and demanded all her money. The woman proceeded to throw approximately $180 on the ground. As the suspect retrieved the money from the ground, the woman ran back to the apartment and called the police. The identity of the alleged suspect is unknown because he was wearing a ski mask during the alleged incident.

If these facts prove to be true, the Jacksonville suspect could be facing charges of Armed Robbery. In an earlier Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog, I described the nuisances of Robbery and the penalties that could result from being convicted. In this case, the charges of Armed Robbery would constitute a first-degree felony, because a deadly weapon was used during the course of the robbery. The penalty for a conviction of a Jacksonville Armed Robbery could result in 30 years or life imprisonment and/or up to a $10,000 fine.

Armed Robbery is a serious criminal offense and should not be taken lightly. Also, taking on the Criminal Justice system alone is not always advantageous to a Jacksonville Criminal Defendant. That is why the advice and counsel of a Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer could prove to be invaluable. With that being said, if you or a loved one are facing a Jacksonville Armed Robbery charge or any type of Jacksonville Criminal Charges, contact a Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer to discuss your case and to make sure your rights are being protected.

January 19, 2012

Jacksonville Man Wanted for Alleged Armed Robbery

Jacksonville Criminal Defense LawyerCurrently, Jacksonville Sheriff's Office is on the hunt for a Jacksonville man wanted for the alleged arm robbery of a cell phone store last Friday. According to the Police reports, the man entered a Metro PCS store located on Soutel Dr. and demanded the money from the register while brandishing a weapon to the employee. No one was hurt during the incident, but the suspect did get away with an undisclosed amount of money. This incident leaves the question what is Armed Robbery and what are the penalties?

Robbery is defined within Florida Statute § 812.13; it reads, "'Robbery' means the taking of money or other property which may be the subject of larceny from the person or custody or another, with intent to either permanently or temporarily deprive the person or the owner of the money or other property, when in the course of taking there is a use of force, violence, assault, or putting in fear." Basically, if the property stole was taken in your presence and you were fearful of injury or death from an armed suspect, then an Armed Robbery has been committed.

There are two types of robbery; with or without a weapon. Robbery without a weapon is a second-degree felony, which could have a potential sentence of up to 15 years and/or a $10,000 in fines. In contrast, an Armed Robbery is a first-degree felony, having a penalty of up to 30 years or life imprisonment (as provided for in the Statute) and/or $10,000 in fines. These are harsh penalties and a Jacksonville robbery charge should not be taken lightly.

An Armed Robbery charge could negatively impact the rest of your live. A Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer knows the law and possible defenses to these types of allegations and can work with you for the best possible outcome. The advice and counsel of a Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer could prove to be invaluable. With that being said, if you or a loved one are facing a Jacksonville Armed Robbery charge or any type of Jacksonville Criminal Charges, contact a Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer to discuss your case and to make sure your rights are being protected.

January 5, 2012

Jacksonville Robbery vs. Jacksonville Burglary, What's what?

Jacksonville Criminal Defense LawyerAs all Jacksonville residents know, the economy has been down in this nation for over a year. Jobs have been lost, homes have gone under, and crime is at an all time high. It is a statistical fact that during a time of economic recession incidents of criminal activity and alcohol abuse are at an all time high. Sometimes, these rough times lead people to make poor decision and to act in ways, if time were good, they would not normally act. Two crimes of particular intrigue are Burglary and Robbery. These two criminal activities are commonly misunderstood and used interchangeably. However, they are two distinct crimes with very different penalties.

Florida defines Burglary as "entering a dwelling, a structure, or a conveyance with the intent to commit an offense therein, unless the premises are at the time open to the public or the defendant is licensed or invited to enter." Florida Statute § 810.02. Basically, if a person enters the home, car, business, etc. of another with the intent to commit an offense (i.e. steal) then they could be found guilty of Burglary.

In contrast Florida defines Robbery as "the taking or money or other property which may be the subject of larceny from the person or custody of another, with the intent to either permanently or temporarily deprive the person or the owner of the money or other property, when in the course of the taking there is the use of force, violence, assault, or putting in fear." Florida Statute § 812.13. Basically, Robbery requires the forceful taking of property or money from the body of the person (i.e. pick-pocket).

In addition to the differences between the crimes themselves, their penalties vary substantially as well. Robbery suspects normally face steeper penalties because of public policy and the intimacy of the crime committed. Normally a charge of Robbery will be either a first or second-degree felony. This could mean up to life in prison for a single conviction! In contrast, Burglary is normally a second or third-degree felony. Burglary still holds a potential for 5-15 years imprisonment, but much less compared to a Robbery charge.

If you or a loved one have been charged with either Robbery or Burglary, contact a Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer to discuss your case and determine what the best course of action in moving forward. It could make all the difference.

December 28, 2011

Florida Resident Killed over $1.25

Jacksonville Criminal Defense LawyerA Miami-Dade resident and Cuba native was recently shot and killed after an attempted armed robbery on his way to work. The victim, Hector Vichot, 53, was on his way to work when approached by two men. The men demanded his money and when Hector turned to run away he was shot in the back. He was taken to a local Florida Hospital for treatment, but later succumbed to his injuries.

The incident occurred on December 16, just weeks before the Christmas. Hector's Brother, Pedro, is distraught over the whole incident. He stated, although Victor is not married, he was close with his two children in Miami and one child in Cuba.

This was a tragic incident that resulted in the death of an innocent man. All for what; $1.25! Yes, that was all Victor had at the time of the attempted robbery. The suspects, who remain at large, will likely face attempted armed robbery charges, aggravated battery and assault, and murder. Penalties resulting from these criminal charges are normally severe and carry substantial jail time.

When facing multiple Criminal charges, the advise and counsel of a Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer will be advantageous to a Jacksonville Criminal Defendant. The legal process is complicated, complex, and not always favorable to unrepresented Jacksonville Criminal Defendants. That is why it is important to contact a Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer if you are facing Criminal charges or already have Criminal charges pending. A Jacksonville Criminal Defense Attorney will discuss your case with you, determine possible defenses and justifications, and work with you for the best possible outcome in your Criminal law matter.

December 21, 2011

Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer :: Salter v. Florida

Jacksonville Criminal Defense LawyerThis case is an appeal from the 15th Circuit in Palm Beach County, where the appellant appeals his conviction, jury instructions, and Court's refusal to consider youthful offender sentencing. The 4th DCA affirmed the conviction and jury instruction, but remanded the sentencing decision to another judge for review of youthful offender status.

The case arose from an armed robbery at a gas station in Palm Beach County. The suspects brandished a weapon during the robbery and while exiting the building fired one shot towards the clerk. The suspects fled the scene. Later the police approached a vehicle for broken taillight. The appellant was found in the backseat with clothing, a gun, and money that matched the type used in the robbery. The appellant made conflicting statements to the police about his participation in the robbery, his statements went from not there to just driving the vehicle. He was found guilty for armed robbery and sentenced to ten (10) years in jail.

The appellant, Harry Salter, appeals the denial of his motion for acquittal and the jury instruction for not making special remarks into the validity of circumstantial evidence. The 4th DCA reviews motions for acquittal De Novo. The appellant argues the evidence was insufficient to prove his guilt and therefore uphold his conviction. However, the court reasoned there was enough direct and circumstantial evidence upon which the jury could draw the conclusion of guilt. Furthermore, the court has the discretion as to give jury instructions regarding circumstantial evidence and the appellant has failed to demonstrate the court's abuse of its discretion.

Finally the appellant appeals the court's denial to sentence him as a youthful offender. The 4th DCA rules that the court has the discretion whether or not to sentence a suspect as a youthful offender. But, in this case the court refused to consider this implication because the appellant chose a jury trial instead of pleading guilty and take a plea bargain. This is a violation of the appellant's Constitutional rights and the 4th DCA remands the matter for resentencing before a new judge to consider whether a youthful offender sentence is proper.

If you are subject to a criminal investigation or have pending criminal charges, contact a Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer to discuss your case and to determine what is the best course of action in moving forward.

November 15, 2011

Suspects Arrested for Jacksonville Florida Robbery Charges

Yesterday, two robbery suspects were arrested in connection with the armed robbery of a store in Jacksonville, Florida. Edward Littleon, age 22, and Frederick Jennings, age 17, are being held in Duval County, Florida. News4jax.com has reported that the Jacksonville Criminal Defendants are accused of stealing "money from the Family Dollar cash office and [making] the employees lie on the floor." An off-duty officer, G.W. Germann, confronted the two suspected robbers. Jacksonville police have reported that "Germann shot [Littleton] in the shoulder, because he was carrying an AK-47 assault rifle," and "Jennings was armed with a loaded revolver."

Although the Jacksonville Juvenile Robbery Defendant, Jennings, is only 17 years-old, he will likely be charged as an adult, due to the severity of the crime, and his co-defendant will be charged in adult criminal court. Since they both were armed with firearms, they are facing the Florida 10-20-Life Statute. Therefore, they are facing a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years in the Florida State Prison. However, a Youthful Offender Sentence may be available, depending on the circumstances.

November 14, 2011

Jacksonville Beach Shooting Death Result in the Arrest of Three People

Last month, a Jax Beach man was shoot and killed in Jacksonville Beach, Florida. Three men have been arrested for this Jacksonville Beach shooting. Jacksonville police suspect that the shooter was William Brown, age 18. Local media (News4Jax) has reported that

"investigators also arrested two other suspects locally in Neptune Beach. They were identified as 27-year-old Adam Holleran, who's charged with armed robbery, and 27-year-old Matthew Webber, who's charged with armed robbery and accessory after the fact."

According to the media reports, it appears that Brown gave information to police that resulted in his arrest. The information that he provided about this Jacksonville robbery and shooting likely led to the result of the other two suspect. Therefore, each of these Jacksonville Criminal Defendants will have a conflict of interest and need separate Jacksonville Criminal Lawyers.

April 14, 2011

St. John's County Sheriff's Office Searches for Suspect in St. Augustine Robbery

Yesterday, a man robbed a Walgreen's Pharmacy in St. Augustine, Florida. According to the Florida Times Union, he walked in to the store's pharmacy and handed the pharmacist a note demanding medications, threatening him if he didn't comply. He lifted his shirt to show a handgun tucked in his belt, so the pharmacist complied with the demand, and the man left.

When people think of an Armed Robbery in St. Augustine, Florida, a man with a ski mask, pointing a gun in a gas station often comes to mind. This "traditional" armed robbery is not always the case. As in the St. Augustine Walgreen's robbery, an armed robbery can be less aggressive. However, the penalties are just as heavy. Merely carrying a firearm during the commission of a robbery subjects the robber to Florida's 10-20-Life Statute.

October 12, 2010

Jacksonville Juvenile Criminal Attorney: Representing Juveniles Charged with Life Felonies

Only days before the landmark decision in the Jacksonville Juvenile case of Graham v. Florida, Jacksonville judge, Elizabeth Senterfitt, sentenced juvenile Daryl Thomas to life in prison without the possibility of parole for armed robbery, a non-homicide felony. In Graham, the United States Supreme Court ruled that juveniles charged with non-homicide felonies cannot be sentence to life without parole. Therefore, Thomas' case was sent back to Judge Senterfitt to resentence him in compliance with the ruling in Graham. She sentenced him to fifty years in Florida State Prison. The Jacksonville Juvenile Criminal Case will be appealed (Jacksonville.com).

May 17, 2010

Jacksonville Juvenile Non-homicide Case Lead to a Ban on Life-Sentences Without Parole for Juveniles

When Jacksonville juvenile criminal defendant, Jamar Graham, was 16 years old, he was charged with armed burglary. He was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole in this 2004 case. Today, the United States Supreme Court (USSC) held that he will be re-sentenced after spending seven years behind bars. The USSC ruled that juveniles sentenced in non-homicide cases should not be sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. However, this rule does not extend to juveniles convicted of homicide. Chief Justice Roberts concurred with the majority opinion in Graham's case, but stated that the ruling should not extend to all juveniles in all non-homicide cases. This opinion will effect other Jacksonville Juveniles that have been sentenced to life-without-parole in non-homicide cases.

If a Florida Juvenile criminal defendant has been sentenced to life without the possibility of parole in a non-homicide case, it is imperative that he or she pursue another sentencing heairng in accordance with Graham v. Florida. To do so, contact a Florida Juvenile Lawyer.

To learn more about Graham's case, visit The Florida Times-Union.

January 8, 2010

Florida Judge is Reversed for Violating Florida Criminal Defendant's Right to a Fair Trial

The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right to a fair and impartial trial. The Sixth Amendment is made applicable to the States, including Florida, via the Fourteenth Amendment.  Pursuant to Rule 3.600(b)(8) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, a Florida Criminal Defendant shall be granted a new trial if:

  1. he did not receive a fair and impartial trial;
  2. this was not due to the defendant's own actions; and
  3. the defendant's substantial rights were prejudiced.  
The Florida Second District Court of Appeals filed an opinion on January 6, 2010 addressing the issue of whether a Florida trial court judge "departed from its required position of neutrality thereby denying [the defendant] his right to a fair trial."  In Seago v. State, this Florida appellate court ruled that the trial judge was not neutral an impartial and departed from his role.  Instead, the judge acted as second prosecutor when he began questioning a witness about her failure to remember events associated with this Florida armed robbery trial.  The judges "improper conduct suggested to the witness that her testimony should be identical to that of a pretrial deposition, in which she named Mr. Seago as the offender."  Thus, Mr. Seago's substantial rights were prejudice, as he was identified.  Due to the Florida judges actions, the Florida Second District Court of Appeals granted Mr. Seago a new trial.  

December 23, 2009

Jacksonville Home Invasion Armed Robbery Investigation Leads to Two Arrests

On Saturday night, December 19, 2009, Jacksonville police officers found Jacksonville resident, Corey Formey, dead in his home near 103rd Street. Two suspects have been arrested in connection with this case. Jerry Drake was arrested for the murder, while Valorie Grant is being charged as an accessory after the fact. Both defendants lived in Chase Ridge Apartments, the same apartment complex as Mr. Formey.

Police believe that the Mr. Drake committed the Jacksonville home invasion armed robbery in order to obtain drugs and money. According to Jacksonville media reports, Mr. Formey was a drug dealer. His apartment was found in disarray, so it is likely that a struggle may have occurred, or the culprit searched the home for drugs and money.

Mr. Drake will be charged with first degree murder in Jacksonville, Florida, because the murder was committed while engaged in a robbery. According to Florida Statute Section 782.04, this is a capital felony punishable by death or life in prison. If Mr. Drake used of a firearm, he will be subject to Florida's 10-20-Life Statute, resulting in a minimum mandatory sentence of life in prison. Since Ms. Grant is charged an accessory after the fact for first-degree murder, she will be charged with a first-degree felony, pursuant to Florida Statute Section 777.03. She can receive up to thirty years in Florida State Prison.

November 12, 2009

United States Supreme Court to Rule on Jacksonville Juvenile Case

658255_u_s__supreme_court_washington_dc.jpgOn November 9, 2009, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two Florida cases that challenged sentencing a juvenile offender to a life sentence without the possibility of parole in non-homicide cases. One case involved a Jacksonville Juvenile Defendant, Jamar Graham. At age 16, Graham committed an armed burglary. He received a sentence that included probation. At age 17, Graham committed a home invasion armed robbery and violated his probation. Thereafter, he was sentenced to life without parole. Graham is now 22-years-old.

In the narrow 2005 opinion of Roper v. Simmons, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled, 5 to 4, that juveniles could not receive the death penalty as it violated the 8th Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. The 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution is applied to the States, including Florida, through the 14th Amendment. Thus, Graham's attorney prefaced his argument on this position.

The Court's decision will likely result in another narrow opinion. While some justices were clearly divided. Others seemed to waiver as to what decision they will make. For instance, Justice Samuel Alito eluded that there are crimes that are so horrific that they may deserve life in prison without parole, especially when committed by an individual that is close to 18-years-old. Justice Scalia indicated that, while rehabilitation is a goal in juvenile cases, punishment and retribution should also be considered. On the other hand, Justice Sotomayor made a good point when she noted that the maximum sentence that an adult can face for crimes which are not homicides is life without parole. Why should a juvenile be treated the same way, since it has already been established that they have not fully developed yet?  Justice Kennedy was not clear as to the position that he would take in the case. While he believes that juveniles should be properly punished for heinous crimes, he does not see how taking away the possibility of parole will create an additional deterrent.

This case has attracted the Jacksonville local media and has captured media headlines nationwide.  It is an important case for several reasons.  Locally, if the Court rules that this Jacksonville Juvenile sentence of life without parole is cruel and unusual, this Jacksonville Juvenile case will be remanded to the lower court for sentencing in accord with such ruling. As for the national attention, this U.S. Supreme Court decision may have a domino effect. There are over 100 people in the United States serving life sentences for crimes which were not homicides. If the Court rules that these sentences do violate the 8th amendment, all of those sentences could be overturned.

December 8, 2008

Two More Juveniles Arrested For Jacksonville Attempted Armed Robbery

volvo_in_a_garge.jpgJacksonville teen, Daniel Sanchez, was not the only person arrested in connection with the attempted armed robbery of Jacksonville Assistant Police Chief, Carson Tranquille.  Two other Jacksonville teens, Ishmael Mercer and Michael Media were also arrested.  According to detectives investigating the Jacksonville attempted armed robbery, Sanchez confessed that he and the two other boys committed the crime.  He stated that he and one of his co-defendants were armed with guns.  

In Jacksonville, Florida, if a person is in actual possession of a firearm when committing a crime, the 10-20-Life statute applies.  In this Jacksonville attempted armed robbery case, the minimum sentence that Sanchez and the other armed co-defendant will receive is 10 years in prison.  Additionally, a defendant that falls under the 10-20-Life statute is ineligible for gain-time and must complete the entire ten years without early release.  Florida's 10-20-Life law does not apply to the co-defendant that was not in actual possession of a firearm.  

For more information on Jacksonville Armed Robbery and Florida's 10-20-Life Statute, read about OJ Simpson's Sentencing and a San Marco Robbery.  

December 5, 2008

OJ Simpson Sentenced in Armed Robbery Case

OJ Simpson was sentenced today on several counts of armed robbery, among other charges.  Due to a combination of consecutive and concurrent sentences, he may serve as much as 33 years in prison.  However, after nine years, he may be released on parole.  

Armed Robbery is a serious charge.  As shown in the OJ case, it can result in an extensive amount of prison time.  For instance, in Jacksonville, Florida, armed robbery with a firearm is a first-degree felony.  Usually, a first-degree felony is punishable by up to 30 years in Florida State Prison.  However, Florida law makes an exception for armed robbery.  In Jacksonville, Florida, it is punishable by life in prison.  

Additionally, Florida's 10-20-Life law statute applies to Jacksonville Armed Robbery with a Firearm.  Under Florida's 10-20-Life statute, if a defendant is in actual possession of a fire-arm during the commission of an armed robbery, he has a minimum mandatory sentence of ten years.  Thus, in Jacksonville, Florida, he will be sentenced any where from ten years to life in prison for armed robbery with a firearm.  

To learn more about Armed Robbery in Jacksonville Florida, contact a Jacksonville Robbery Attorney.