February 8, 2010

Can You Expunge a Florida Aggravate Battery or Florida Domestic Battery?

Can you expunge a Florida aggravated battery or domestic battery record if the charges were dropped?

A Florida criminal record may be sealed pursuant to Florida Statute Section 943.0585. Florida Statute Section 907.041 provides a list of crimes that cannot be sealed. However, if the charges were dropped, then, you can expunge your record. The enumerated list of crimes do not apply when petitioning to have your record expunged. If the charges were dropped, the FDLE will not reject a Florida Criminal Defendant's application for a certificate of eligibility, assuming all other necessary conditions are fulfilled. However, if the original offense was a violent crime or was a sexual offense, it will be more difficult to have the petition to expunge granted. Therefore, it is important to be well prepared for a hearing and hire a Criminal Record Expunging Attorney.

Bookmark and Share
February 8, 2010

Can You Seal a Florida Aggravate Battery or Florida Domestic Battery?

Can you seal a Florida aggravated battery or Florida domestic battery record if you pled to a lesser or amended offense, such as a simple battery or fighting/affray?

According to the Florida Statute Section 943.059, an individual may not have his criminal record sealed if it relates to "a violation enumerated in s. 907.041...without regard to whether adjudication was withheld, if the defendant was found guilty of or pled guilty or nolo contendere to the offense." Florida Statute Section 907.041 lists aggravated battery and domestic battery as an enumerated crimes. However, Florida simple battery and Florida fighting or affray are not an enumerated crimes. Therefore, a Florida Criminal Defendant that has pled guilty or nolo contendere to a non-enumerated crime should be able to have his or her record sealed, so long as adjudication of guilt was withheld, according to the plain language of this Florida statute. This is not the case. The FDLE will reject the application. However, the Florida Supreme Court has not decided this issue. Therefore, it will be interesting to see what their decision would be on such an issue.
Bookmark and Share
February 3, 2010

Criminal Lawyers in Jacksonville Learn From Jacksonville Criminal Cases of the Past

Criminal Lawyers in Jacksonville should tune into E! Television Network to watch "E! Original Countdowns: Too Young to Kill: 15 Shocking Crimes" which premiers tonight at 9:00 P.M. and will run through out the week.  As indicated by the title, the show will cover fifteen juvenile criminal cases from across the nation. The murder of Maddie Clifton should be of particular interest to Criminal Lawyers in Jacksonville since it was one of the most highly publicized murders in Jacksonville's history. Joshua Phillips, the defendant in this case, is a Jacksonville resident and is currently serving a life sentence in Florida State Prison after his conviction for the first-degree murder of Maddie Clifton.

I had the opportunity to speak with Joshua Phillips' mother. She informed me that his case is still moving through the Florida appellate courts. She advised me that several mistakes were made at the trial level of this case. As such, it is important for Jacksonville Criminal Lawyers to follow this case, so we can learn from the mistakes of other Jacksonville criminal defense attorneys. Additionally, the Joshua Phillips/Maddie Clifton Jacksonville Murder Case deals with the sentencing of juveniles to life without parole, which is an important issue in Jacksonville, Florida.

Bookmark and Share
January 23, 2010

Jacksonville Criminal Defendants are Subjected to Foreclosure

Jacksonville Criminal Defense Attorneys dedicate their careers to helping criminal defendants acheive favorable outcomes in criminal cases. However, we cannot win every case. In some cases, a Jacksonville Criminal Defendant will be sentenced to serve time in jail or prison. Not only is this disappointing to the Jacksonville Criminal Defense Attorney that fought to keep the client out of jail, but it devastates the client's family.

Imagine that a husband and father of four is sentenced to 13 months in Florida State Prison. He is the sole provider for the family. His wife only has a high school education and has spent the past 10 years raising his children. She has three children in school and one toddler at home. Now, that her husband is gone. She must go back to work. She must pay for daycare and try to pay the bills on her own. She tries to find a job, but due to her lack of further education and experience, she cannot find a job that will cover her mortgage payment. Thus, her home becomes the subject to a foreclosure action. Now, she and her four children are going to be homeless.

As a Jacksonville Criminal Defense Attorney, I have learned that representation of a criminal defendant does not always stop when the criminal case closes. Often, the Jacksonville criminal defendant's family needs representation for a foreclosure case or drafting of estate planning documents or a durable power of attorney. Thus, Jacksonville Criminal Defense Attorneys should be familiar with other areas of practice or be prepared to refer the case to an attorney that practices in those fields.

Bookmark and Share
January 22, 2010

Jacksonville Criminal Attorney and the Duval County Judicial System

As a Jacksonville Criminal Attorney, I am familiar with the Duval County judicial system. I have practiced in front of most of the Jacksonville county (misdemeanor) and circuit (felony and juvenile) court judges. As a Jacksonville resident and registered voter, I am familiar with the election of Duval County judges. In Jacksonville, the public elects its judges. I assumed that other states elected their state judges as well. However, this assumption was incorrect.

Today, I was taking a criminal certified legal education course in South Carolina. I was the only Jacksonville Criminal Attorney in the room. I learned that South Carolina residents do not elect thier judges. Instead, the judges are appointed by a committee. The committee investigates the judicial candiates and chooses three candidates. Then, one canditate is appointed from the three people.

South Carolina's judicial appointment process may be more beneficial to criminal defendants. It is no surprise that Jacksonville criminal defendants are not the most respected members of society. Many people do not respect a criminal defendant's rights they way that they should or in the manner that the constitution demands. Indeed, when judges run for office, they take a stance that they are "tough on crime." While crimes should be properly punished, judges should make decisions based upon the evidence presened and argument rendered by counsel. They should not be influenced by the public's perception that a judge should be "tougher" on crime. Perhaps, if we did not publically elected judges, we would not have the outside influence of public perception in the criminal courtroom.

On the other hand, I would question the political motivation behind the appointment process. Would a judge make legal decisions based upon the ideals of the appointment committee? While most judges are not persuaded by the pressures of an election or an appointment, it may be a factor in some cases and with some judges.

Bookmark and Share
January 20, 2010

Criminal Defense Lawyers in Jacksonville

If a person goes through the yellow pages of the telephone book, he or she would be overwhelmed with the amount of criminal defense attorneys available in Jacksonville, Florida. However, selecting an attorney is not an easy process. Often, people will ask me whether or not they should hire a private attorney or use an attorney at the public defender office. My response is "if you can afford a private attorney, you should hire one."

First, the services of the office of the public defender in Jacksonville are only for those clients that cannot afford an attorney. A public defender is not appointed to everyone that wants an attorney, just for those that do not have funds available to hire a Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer.

Second, a Jacksonville criminal defendant cannot chose which attorney at the public defender will represent him. Therefore, if he is unhappy with his public defender, he cannot "shop around" and request another attorney be appointed. There are different types of attorneys at the public defender office and in private practice. Some attorneys are better than others. When you hire a Jacksonville criminal attorney, you have the option of meeting with the attorney and choosing which attorney better suits your needs.

Third, State budget cuts have placed a substantial strain on most state-funded agency. The Office of the Public Defender is no exception. Thus, each public defender has a substantial case load. This is not beneficial to criminal defendants that require a lot of attention, and cases that require immediate investigation in order to preserve evidence. Additionally, as a Criminal Defense Lawyer in Jacksonville, I have discovered that the best defense in a criminal case is a good offense. Particularly, a good Jacksonville criminal defense attorney should always be one step a head of the prosecution. The sooner that you start the defense investigation, the better. Quite often, I have been able to speak with witnesses and collect evidence before the state attorney has opened the file. This type of preparation is required in order to set forth evidence that the state will consider when deciding whether to file formal charges against a criminal defendant in Jacksonville.

Bookmark and Share
January 14, 2010

Can You Seal or Expunge a Florida Criminal Record if Your Juvenile Record Has Been Sealed?

In Florida, if a juvenile criminal defendant successfully completes a pretrial diversion program, his charges are dropped and he record may be sealed pursuant to Florida Statute 943.0582. Although this Florida Statute uses the term "sealed," it differs significantly with respect to the "record sealing" that most people are familiar with.

Most Florida record seals and expunctions are made pursuant to other Florida laws. Florida Statute Section 943.059 governs record sealing, while Florida Statute Section 943.0585 covers record expunctions. If a Florida criminal defendant wishes to have his record sealed or expunged under these statutes, he cannot have a prior record seal or expunction. However, a Florida juvenile criminal defendant that has had his Florida criminal record sealed in accordance with Section 943.0582 may have another charged sealed or expunged. Therefore, if a criminal defendant is otherwise eligible to have his record sealed or expunged pursuant to Sections 943.059 or 943.0585, a prior seal under Section 943.0582 will not prevent a subsequent one.

If you are interested in getting your Florida Criminal Record Sealed or Expunged, contact a Florida Sealing and Expunging Attorney.

Bookmark and Share
January 8, 2010

Florida Judge is Reversed for Violating Florida Criminal Defendant's Right to a Fair Trial

The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right to a fair and impartial trial. The Sixth Amendment is made applicable to the States, including Florida, via the Fourteenth Amendment.  Pursuant to Rule 3.600(b)(8) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, a Florida Criminal Defendant shall be granted a new trial if:

  1. he did not receive a fair and impartial trial;
  2. this was not due to the defendant's own actions; and
  3. the defendant's substantial rights were prejudiced.  
The Florida Second District Court of Appeals filed an opinion on January 6, 2010 addressing the issue of whether a Florida trial court judge "departed from its required position of neutrality thereby denying [the defendant] his right to a fair trial."  In Seago v. State, this Florida appellate court ruled that the trial judge was not neutral an impartial and departed from his role.  Instead, the judge acted as second prosecutor when he began questioning a witness about her failure to remember events associated with this Florida armed robbery trial.  The judges "improper conduct suggested to the witness that her testimony should be identical to that of a pretrial deposition, in which she named Mr. Seago as the offender."  Thus, Mr. Seago's substantial rights were prejudice, as he was identified.  Due to the Florida judges actions, the Florida Second District Court of Appeals granted Mr. Seago a new trial.  

Bookmark and Share
January 6, 2010

Florida Jurors are Permitted to Ask Questions in Florida Criminal Jury Trial

The Florida Supreme Court recently made changes in the law which allow jurors to take notes and question witnesses in civil cases. As for criminal cases, the judge presiding over the case may decide whether or not to permit such questioning. Some Florida judges permit this type of questioning routinely. For instance, Judge Michael Andrews is the judge presiding over the Diullio murder trial in New Port Richey, Florida. He allowed jurors to ask questions during the trial. The questions were submitted to the judge in writing to determine if the questions may be asked. For example, while a jurors were permitted to ask what clothing Diullio and his co-defendants were wearing on the night of the murder, they were not permitted to ask whether Diullio had a criminal record. The reason this question was not asked is because it violates the Florida Rules of Evidence. Therefore, Florida jurors may not ask a question that an attorney would not be permitted to ask.

Some Florida judges do not allow jurors to ask questions in criminal cases. Circuit Court Judge, Pat Siracusa, does not permit such questioning. She believes that it is the prosecutors burden to prove the case. When jurors ask questions, they leave their role of the neutral fact-finder and become investigators.

To learn more about John Ditullio's murder trial, visit www.tampabay.com. If you have questions about a Florida Criminal Case, contact a Jacksonville Criminal Attorney.

Bookmark and Share
January 4, 2010

Jacksonville Florida Traffic Citation: Can You Be Cited for Flashing Your Headlights?

1160501_night_traffic.jpg

Drivers flash their lights by going from a low beam to a high beam. Usually, a Jacksonville driver does this to indicate to others drivers that there is something that they should be aware of. For instance, if a prudent driver sees a disable car on the side of the road, he may flash his lights to inform the oncoming vehicle of a dangerous situation. This could protect people in the disable vehicle as well on the driver and passengers of the oncoming vehicle.  As a child, my mother would flash her lights at other vehicles when she saw a dog wandering the highway. She did this to get the other vehicles to slow down.

Sometimes, Jacksonville drivers are ticketed for flashing their high beams at other vehicles. Jacksonville police officers issue the citation pursuant to Florida Statute 316.2937(7) which states that "flashing lights are prohibited on vehicles except as a means of indicating a right or left turn, to change lanes, or to indicate that the vehicle is lawfully stopped or disabled upon the highway or except that the lamps authorized in" this Section. However, this is not permitted. This Florida law was not meant to prohibit flashing your high beams in the manner listed above. In fact, a handbook issued by the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles recommends that a driver flash his high beams at an oncoming vehicle that if another vehicle is approaching with its high beams illuminated. In 

State v. Cason, a Seminole County court ruled that Florida Statute Section 316.2397(7) does not prohibit a driver from flashing his high beams or turning his lights on and off. The court found that it did not matter that the driver was doing so with the intent to warn other drivers of a police officer with a radar device.

Note only should a ticket issued in this manner be challenged by a Jacksonville Traffic Attorney, but it could be the basis for a motion to suppress. For example, a Jacksonville DUI Lawyer could try to get a DUI stop invalidated if the stop is based on these grounds.

Bookmark and Share
December 24, 2009

Florida Illegal Seizure Leads to Suppression of Cocaine

In Florida, evidence that is obtain as a result of an unlawful search or seizure can be suppressed. Normally, a Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer will analyze the case to determine whether an illegal search or seizure has occurred. If one has taken place, the Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer will likely filing a motion to suppress any evidence retrieved due to such conduct.

For instance, the Florida Third District Court of Appeals held that the defendant's motion to suppress should have been granted, because the cocaine that she was charged with possessing was found as a result of unlawful police detention. In Hidelgo v. State, Ms. Hidelgo was the passenger of a vehicle that was stopped due to a traffic violation. She and the driver consented to a search of the vehicle. During this search, police patted down Ms. Hidelgo, handcuffed her, and placed her in the police car. The police did not find anything in the vehicle, and Ms. Hidelgo and the driver were free to leave. After this, an officer searched the back of the car in which Ms. Hidelgo was held. He found a plastic bag with cocaine. The officers stopped the vehicle once again and arrested Ms. Hildelgo. She was charged with Florida Possession of Cocaine.

The Florida Third District Court of Appeals ruled that the stop and search of the vehicle were legitimate. Although Ms. Hidelgo consented to the search of the vehicle, the State of Florida did not present evidence to establish that she "consented to being handcuffed and place by herself in the back of a police vehicle for a lengthy period of time." She was treated as if she was under arrest as she was not free to leave.

Under Florida Law, a law enforcement officer may detain an occupant during a valid search of the premises in order to:

  1. prevent flight in the event that incriminating evidence is found;
  2. minimize the risk of violence to officers or others; and
  3. orderly complete a search.  
However, police must use the least restrictive means to do so.  Police cannot routinely handcuff a person to conduct an investigatory stop.  Their actions must be reasonable in response to the situation.  In fact, "absent other threatening circumstances, once the pat down reveals the absence of weapons, the handcuffs should be removed."  The court found that "valid consent to search a vehicle does not authorize law enforcement officers to order the occupants out of the vehicle and place them in handcuffs for a lengthy period of time in the back of the police vehicle."  

Bookmark and Share
December 23, 2009

Jacksonville Home Invasion Armed Robbery Investigation Leads to Two Arrests

On Saturday night, December 19, 2009, Jacksonville police officers found Jacksonville resident, Corey Formey, dead in his home near 103rd Street. Two suspects have been arrested in connection with this case. Jerry Drake was arrested for the murder, while Valorie Grant is being charged as an accessory after the fact. Both defendants lived in Chase Ridge Apartments, the same apartment complex as Mr. Formey.

Police believe that the Mr. Drake committed the Jacksonville home invasion armed robbery in order to obtain drugs and money. According to Jacksonville media reports, Mr. Formey was a drug dealer. His apartment was found in disarray, so it is likely that a struggle may have occurred, or the culprit searched the home for drugs and money.

Mr. Drake will be charged with first degree murder in Jacksonville, Florida, because the murder was committed while engaged in a robbery. According to Florida Statute Section 782.04, this is a capital felony punishable by death or life in prison. If Mr. Drake used of a firearm, he will be subject to Florida's 10-20-Life Statute, resulting in a minimum mandatory sentence of life in prison. Since Ms. Grant is charged an accessory after the fact for first-degree murder, she will be charged with a first-degree felony, pursuant to Florida Statute Section 777.03. She can receive up to thirty years in Florida State Prison.

Bookmark and Share
December 22, 2009

Florida Search and Seizure: Mere Possession of a Weapon is Not Grounds to Search

Unreasonable searches and seizures are unconstitutional. If a police officer violates this prohibition against unlawful searches and seizures, any evidence that was found due to such violation can be suppressed. Therefore, the evidence cannot be introduced at trial.

In Florida, there are three types of police encounters:

  1. a consensual encounter in which a person is free to leave at any time;
  2. a investigatory stop (Terry Stop) in which the person is not free to leave, but the police officer may only pat the subject down and the officer must have a well-founded suspicion of criminal activity; and
  3. an arrest that is supported by probable cause to believe that a crime has occurred (or is being committed).  
Recently, the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeals addressed this issue.  In Regalado v. State, an anonymous tipster informed police that Mr. Regalado was in possession of a firearm.  An officer stopped Mr. Regalado and patted him down.  As a result, he founded a gun on Mr. Regalado.  Mr. Regalado filed a Motion to Suppress the weapon due to an unlawful search and seizure.  The trial denied Mr. Regalado's motion.  The Florida appellate court reversed this decision and granted his motion.  The court ruled that:

"the only information received by the officer was that the individual had a gun.  Possession of a gun is not illegal in Florida.  Even if it is concealed, it is not illegal if the carrier has obtained a concealed weapons permit.  Although the officer observed a bulge in Regalado's waistband, which in his experience looked like a gun, no facts and circumstances were presented to show that Regalado's carrying a concealed weapon was without a permit and thus illegal."

Since the officer did not have a well-founded suspicion that the Defendant was involved in criminal activity, he did not have grounds to conduct an involuntary search and seizure.  When a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as applied to the States via the Fourteenth Amendment, it is important to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of the search or seizure.  If you believe that you have been subjected to such, you should contact a Jacksonville Criminal Attorney to discuss your rights.  A Jacksonville Criminal Attorney that has experience suppressing evidence recovered due to unlawful searches and seizures can investigate whether your rights were violated.  


Bookmark and Share
December 16, 2009

Can You Be Stopped for a Cracked Windshield in Florida?

Is a police officer permitted to stop a driver with a cracked windshield in Florida? It depends. A Florida driver can be stopped problems with a windshield if the windshield violates a provision listed in Florida Statute Section 316.2952 or Section 316.610.  A cracked windshield would be covered in Section 316.610.  However, a stop is only permissible under this Section if the crack poses a safety hazard.  This would make the vehicle unsafe and allows the officer to stop the driver, because he has a particularized and objective basis to believe that the driver is violating the law.  

On the other hand, if the windshield does not create a safety hazard, the officer does not have reason to stop the driver.  In

Hilton v. State, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that marijuana seized as a result of a stop pursuant to Section 316.610 was obtained illegally.  The court held that there was no evidence to establish that the crack in Hilton's windshield rendered his vehicle unsafe.  Thus, there was no evidence to support an objectively reasonable suspicion that the vehicle was unsafe and in violation of the statute.  

Like Mr. Hilton, criminal defendants are often stopped because of traffic infractions, such as a cracked windshield, in Florida.  While some stops may be legitimate, others are not.  Therefore, it is important to have a Jacksonville Criminal Attorney review the facts surrounding the stop to determine if a motion to suppress should be filed based on an illegal stop.   

Bookmark and Share
December 3, 2009

Jacksonville Juvenile to Face Criminal Charges for Downtown Shooting

Jacksonville Juvenile, Quintavis Seay, is only 16-years-old and charged with the homicide of a 20-year-old Jacksonville man, Jeremy Godboldt.  According to local reports, Seay was involved in a physical altercation with Godboldt and his brothers.  At some point, Seay allegedly shot Godboldt, who was later pronounced dead at the hospital.

Seay will likely be charged as an adult.  If he is charged with murder, he could face life in prison without parole, despite his age.  Since the shooting death stemmed from a fight between the alleged victim (Godboldt) and the Jacksonville criminal defendant (Seay), I would not be surprised to see Seay's Jacksonville Criminal Defense Lawyer argue that Seay acted in self-defense.  This is even more plausible considering that Godboldt's two brothers may have assisted him in the fight.  Also, reports state that "the fight that led to Godboldt's death was part of an ongoing dispute between him and Seay."  Therefore, we need to look at all the evidence, including prior contact between these two people, to see if Seay acted reasonably under the circumstances.

Bookmark and Share